Economics
New submissions
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]
New submissions for Fri, 22 May 26
- [1] arXiv:2605.21647 [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Strategic Inertia and Institutional Change:A Behavioral Model of Price Reforms versus Action DeletionSubjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Why do inefficient practices, technologies, or institutions persist even when su perior alternatives are available? This paper introduces a quantal response equilib rium with status-quo bias (QRE-SB) in which each player incurs a fixed switching cost when deviating from an inherited default action. In a binary coordination game, we compare two policy interventions: a tax on the default action (price-only reform) versus deleting the default action entirely (ban). We prove that there exists a threshold tax below which the status quo persists and above which a transition occurs; notably, this threshold does not depend on the degree of bounded ratio nality. Deleting the default action always forces play to the superior equilibrium, irrespective of switching costs or rationality. Moreover, when the superior equilib rium is Pareto-dominant, deletion yields strictly higher expected welfare than any finite tax that leaves the old action feasible. Numerical simulations illustrate the theoretical predictions. The framework provides a formal foundation for the policy principle that sometimes you must ban, not just tax, with direct applications to climate policy, social media regulation, and international sanctions.
- [2] arXiv:2605.21656 [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Why Efficient Reforms Fail: Endogenous Game Transformation under Status Quo Bias and Social PreferencesSubjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
Why do societies remain stuck in inferior institutions even when superior al ternatives are widely recognized? This paper develops a model in which agents choose not only actions within a game but also transformations of the game it self. Transformations may be soft, changing payoffs through taxes or subsidies, or hard, changing feasibility through deletion or replacement of actions. Within a coordination model with status-quo bias (switching cost) and boundedly rational play (logit quantal response), we show that these interventions are qualitatively different: finite taxes shift behavior continuously but cannot eliminate residual use of the inherited action, whereas deletion bypasses inertia by removing the action from the feasible set. We further characterize how antagonistic social preferences at the meta level can block reforms that are individually beneficial for every player. The framework provides a formal rationale for why hard feasibility restrictions of ten dominate soft price incentives under inertia, with direct applications to climate transition (carbon tax vs. fossil-fuel phase-out) and platform regulation (fines vs. deletion of addictive features).
- [3] arXiv:2605.22076 [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Isomorphic Dynamic ProgramsComments: 31 pages, 1 figureSubjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
We study relationships between dynamic programs by applying conjugacy methods from dynamical systems theory. When two dynamic programs are connected by an order isomorphism, we show that optimality properties transmit from one formulation to the other. We apply these results to Epstein--Zin preferences with time preference shocks, obtaining a sharp characterization of when optimality holds. We also show that multiplicative Kreps--Porteus preferences and risk-sensitive preferences are isomorphic, so that well-known results for the latter carry over to the former. Finally, we demonstrate how isomorphic transformations can improve the numerical accuracy of value function approximations, with gains of two orders of magnitude in a multisector real business cycle model.
- [4] arXiv:2605.22095 [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Not Yet: Humans Outperform LLMs in a Colonel Blotto TournamentSubjects: General Economics (econ.GN); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has spurred economists to study how humans and LLMs behave in strategic settings. We organized a series of round-robin tournaments in the Colonel Blotto game. This game attracts game theorists' attention due to high-dimensional action space and the absence of pure strategy Nash equilibria. In the first tournament, more than 200 human participants competed against one another. In the second tournament, several popular LLMs were invited to submit strategies. In the third tournament, we matched the number of LLM strategies to the number submitted by humans. We find that humans more often employ better-calibrated intermediate-level allocation heuristics and outperform the simpler, more stereotyped strategies submitted by LLMs. Strategic sophistication is key to success if and only if the necessary level of reasoning depth is reached, while lower and higher levels of reasoning offer no clear advantage over the primitive strategies. Among humans, field of study weakly predicts success: participants with STEM backgrounds perform better in the first tournament. Surprisingly, humans almost do not adjust their strategies across tournaments with different sets of opponents. This result suggests that humans base their choices primarily on the game's rules rather than on the identity of their opponents, treating LLMs much like human competitors.
- [5] arXiv:2605.22632 [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Position: The Pre/Post-Training Boundary Should Govern IP in Industry-Academia ML CollaborationsSubjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
Industry-academia ML collaborations routinely fail to launch -- not for scientific reasons, but because academics must publish while companies must protect models trained on proprietary data, and no standard contract framework resolves this tension. Because contracts are negotiated by legal departments alone, many apparent legal disputes are incentive misalignment problems that only scientists at the table can correctly diagnose. We propose PBOS (Protect-the-Business / Open-Source-the-Science), a community-adoptable contract template anchored to a single technically-grounded boundary: pre-training artifacts (architectures, training code, benchmarks, untrained weights) are open science; post-training artifacts (weights trained on proprietary data) are business IP. This boundary is technically meaningful, legally clean, and auditable -- and could not have been drawn correctly without scientists at the negotiating table. We argue the ML community should adopt PBOS as its default contract for such collaborations.
Cross-lists for Fri, 22 May 26
- [6] arXiv:2605.21743 (cross-list from cs.AI) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Who Uses AI? Platforms, Workforce, and AI ExposureSubjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); General Economics (econ.GN)
A growing literature uses artificial intelligence platform conversation logs to measure occupation exposure. We show that these scores partly measure platform user base rather than the workforce. Holding outcome, sample, controls, and estimator fixed while varying only the platform input changes the post-ChatGPT employment coefficient by a factor of 1.9, and within-vendor consumer-versus-enterprise channels produce estimates that disagree in sign. Reweighting to Bureau of Labor Statistics workforce shares attenuates estimates by 42 to 93 percent. We formalize the non-classical measurement error, derive probability limits and partial-identification bounds for employment elasticities. The bias understates substitution more than augmentation.
Replacements for Fri, 22 May 26
- [7] arXiv:2408.07842 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Quantile and Distribution Treatment Effects on the Treated with Possibly Non-Continuous OutcomesComments: Second draft: May 20, 2026; First draft: August 16, 2024Subjects: Econometrics (econ.EM)
- [8] arXiv:2501.07772 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Honest Inference for Stochastic OptimizationSubjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST); Econometrics (econ.EM); Methodology (stat.ME)
- [9] arXiv:2503.06007 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
- [10] arXiv:2504.19841 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Inference with few treated unitsSubjects: Econometrics (econ.EM)
- [11] arXiv:2505.18391 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Bayesian Estimation of Cohort-Time-Stratum Specific Effects in Staggered Difference-in-DifferencesSubjects: Econometrics (econ.EM); Methodology (stat.ME)
- [12] arXiv:2506.19176 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Visibly Fair MechanismsSubjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
- [13] arXiv:2507.13274 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: The Nexus between Dataization and Technological Progress in General Equilibrium of MacroeconomicsAuthors: Yongheng HuComments: 47 pages, 17 figuresSubjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
- [14] arXiv:2508.19326 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Delegated ContractingComments: Comments: 51 pages; expanded introduction and related literature, added extensions to interdependent values and multi-agent settings, substantially revised procurement and efficiency applications, new analysis of contracting rights and buy-sell clauses, exposition and references improvedSubjects: Theoretical Economics (econ.TH)
- [15] arXiv:2601.11845 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Reevaluating Causal Estimation Methods with Data from a Product ReleaseComments: 53 pagesSubjects: Econometrics (econ.EM); Methodology (stat.ME)
- [16] arXiv:2601.15537 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Can Rising Consumption Deepen Inequality?Comments: 21 pages, 8 figuresJournal-ref: The European Physical Journal Special Topics (2026)Subjects: Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph); General Economics (econ.GN)
- [17] arXiv:2602.16401 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Stackelberg Equilibria in Monopoly Insurance Markets with Probability WeightingSubjects: Risk Management (q-fin.RM); Theoretical Economics (econ.TH); Mathematical Finance (q-fin.MF)
- [18] arXiv:2604.22445 (replaced) [pdf, ps, other]
-
Title: Inference in Tightly Identified and Large-Scale Sign-Restricted SVARsComments: 39 pages, 11 figures. Updated introduction. Updated empirical section with re-run estimation results. Replaced ESS graphs with tables. Updated restriction on the response of employment to labor supply shock in the large modelSubjects: Econometrics (econ.EM)
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, econ, recent, 2605, contact, help (Access key information)